Internet Sex Crime Defense

Discreet, Aggressive Defense Against Internet Sex Crime Allegations

Internet sex crime allegations are among the most devastating and dangerous charges a person can face. These cases move fast, involve digital evidence that most people do not understand, and carry consequences that extend far beyond jail or prison, including public stigma, lifetime registration risks, and permanent damage to careers and families.

At Mumen Barlaskar Law Firm PLLC, we handle internet sex crime cases with absolute discretion, technical precision, and aggressive litigation strategy. We understand that these prosecutions are often driven by sting operations, entrapment tactics, and overbroad digital searches, rather than by actual victims or completed acts.

We defend clients throughout Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb Counties, where prosecutors pursue these cases relentlessly, and judges impose some of the harshest conditions in the criminal system.

Common Internet Sex Crime Charges We Defend

We represent individuals accused of a wide range of internet-based sex offenses, including:
  • Solicitation or attempted solicitation
  • Accusations arising from online chat or messaging platforms
  • Possession or alleged possession of illegal digital content
  • Distribution or intent-to-distribute allegations
  • Charges stemming from undercover sting operations
Many of these cases are manufactured by law enforcement tactics, not organic criminal conduct.

How Internet Sex Crime Cases Are Actually Built

Unlike traditional crimes, internet sex cases are built almost entirely on digital evidence and police-controlled interactions.
Prosecutors typically rely on:
  • Undercover officers posing online
  • Selective chat logs taken out of context
  • IP address assumptions
  • Broad search warrants for electronic devices
  • Forensic analysis performed by government agents
The narrative is written by law enforcement from the start.

Entrapment and Sting Operations

Many internet sex crime cases originate from police sting operations designed to provoke responses rather than investigate crimes.

Entrapment defenses focus on:

  • Who initiated contact
  • Whether law enforcement induced criminal behavior
  • Whether the accused was predisposed to commit a crime

Improper sting tactics can invalidate entire prosecutions when attacked.

Search, Seizure, and Digital Evidence Challenges

Digital evidence is not immune from constitutional scrutiny. We aggressively challenge:

  • Overbroad or unsupported search warrants
  • Illegal seizure of phones, computers, and storage devices
  • Chain-of-custody failures
  • Improper forensic analysis
  • Evidence obtained outside warrant scope

When digital evidence is suppressed, the prosecution’s case often collapses.

Penalties, Registration, and Lifetime Consequences

Internet sex crime convictions can trigger:

  • Prison or jail sentences
  • Lifetime probation in some cases
  • Mandatory sex offender registration
  • Severe restrictions on housing, employment, and internet use
  • Public exposure and stigma
  • Devastating immigration consequences, including mandatory removal

These are life-altering penalties, not temporary setbacks.

Bond Conditions and Pretrial Restrictions

Courts frequently impose extreme bond conditions, including:

  • Internet bans
  • Device restrictions
  • GPS monitoring
  • No-contact orders

These conditions can cripple employment and family life. Early legal intervention is essential.

How We Defend Internet Sex Crime Allegations

We approach every case as a high-stakes trial prosecution, focusing on:

  • Challenging entrapment and inducement
  • Suppressing unlawfully obtained digital evidence
  • Attacking forensic reliability and assumptions
  • Exposing selective evidence presentation
  • Preventing unnecessary registration exposure
  • Preparing cases for jury trial when required

Discretion, speed, and precision matter.

What To Do If You Are Under Investigation or Charged

DO:

  • Remain silent and contact an attorney immediately
  • Preserve devices without accessing or altering them
  • Follow bond conditions strictly

DO NOT:

  • Speak to police or investigators
  • Consent to searches of devices
  • Attempt to explain online communications
  • Discuss the case electronically

Internet Sex Crimes – Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, but chats are often misinterpreted or selectively used.
Often yes. Early defense can limit scope and duration.
Registration depends on the charge and outcome. Avoiding registration is a core defense goal.
Yes. Many cases fail due to entrapment or illegal searches.
Scroll to Top

(313) 893-2500

Mumen Barlaskar Law Firm: 2649 Caniff Hamtramck, MI 48212